<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Sidewiki: A top tip for site owners</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thefloatingfrog.co.uk/news-reviews/google-sidewiki-a-top-tip-for-site-owners/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thefloatingfrog.co.uk/news-reviews/google-sidewiki-a-top-tip-for-site-owners/</link>
	<description>Design, Photography, Internet and Geek related</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 23:28:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: vextasy</title>
		<link>http://www.thefloatingfrog.co.uk/news-reviews/google-sidewiki-a-top-tip-for-site-owners/comment-page-1/#comment-3121</link>
		<dc:creator>vextasy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 21:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thefloatingfrog.co.uk/?p=3460#comment-3121</guid>
		<description>Thanks Zoe, I did find the article useful because this one had passed me by. It&#039;s really quite scary, don&#039;t you think?

It seems to me that the danger is that unmoderated content, and content that you have no control over, can appear to be associated with your site. At least in a normal wiki there is an opportunity for moderation or repair of vandalism by the community but not, as I understand it, with sidewiki.

If this came from anyone but Google I think it would be easy to ignore it and watch it fade away. But, unfortunately, as it comes from Google there is a frighteningly good chance it may be with us for a while.

It also means that site owners would feel the need to install the wretched Google toolbar just to monitor a sidewiki.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Zoe, I did find the article useful because this one had passed me by. It&#8217;s really quite scary, don&#8217;t you think?</p>
<p>It seems to me that the danger is that unmoderated content, and content that you have no control over, can appear to be associated with your site. At least in a normal wiki there is an opportunity for moderation or repair of vandalism by the community but not, as I understand it, with sidewiki.</p>
<p>If this came from anyone but Google I think it would be easy to ignore it and watch it fade away. But, unfortunately, as it comes from Google there is a frighteningly good chance it may be with us for a while.</p>
<p>It also means that site owners would feel the need to install the wretched Google toolbar just to monitor a sidewiki.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

